Tell me if I’m wrong – I let a group of bikers walk a seven-year-old into a courthouse and now I might lose my job.
I’ve been a social worker in Cuyahoga County for nineteen years. I’ve handled over four hundred cases involving kids who’ve been through things no kid should go through. I’ve never once been written up. I’ve never once been called into a disciplinary meeting. Until last Thursday.
The child’s name is Dominic. He’s seven. He was supposed to testify against his mother’s boyfriend, a man who did things to him I can’t put in writing without wanting to throw my laptop across the room. Dominic hadn’t slept in four days. His foster mom, Barb Kessler, called me at six in the morning and said he was hiding under his bed and WOULDN’T COME OUT.
I’d been working with Dominic for five months. I knew what he responded to. Safety. Big people who made him feel small things couldn’t reach him. His therapist and I had talked about this.
There’s a group called Guardians on Chrome. They’re a biker organization – not a gang, not an MC, a registered nonprofit – that escorts abused children to court appearances. They’ve operated in fourteen states for over a decade. I’d seen them work with kids in Summit County. I’d watched a little girl who couldn’t stop shaking walk into a courtroom like she owned it because eight bikers in leather vests told her nothing was getting past them.
I called their chapter president, a retired firefighter named Doug Wozniak. He had six riders at Barb’s house by 8:15 AM.
Dominic came out from under the bed.
He walked between them across the parking lot. He held Doug’s hand up the courthouse steps. He was calm. He was READY.
Then my supervisor, Tricia Holbrook, met us at the entrance. She took one look at the group and pulled me aside. She said, “What the hell is this? You brought a BIKER GANG to a child’s court appearance?”
I tried to explain. She cut me off.
“This is wildly inappropriate. You’ve compromised the optics of this case. The defense attorney is going to have a field day. You did this without authorization and I’m reporting it.”
Dominic testified. He got through the whole thing. The prosecutor told me afterward it was the strongest child testimony she’d seen in three years.
Didn’t matter. Tricia filed a formal complaint Monday morning. She’s recommending a thirty-day suspension and supervised caseload review. She told HR I exercised “reckless judgment” and “introduced unauthorized third parties into a sensitive proceeding.”
My friends and family are split. Half of them say I did what the kid needed and Tricia is covering her own ass. The other half say I should have gone through channels, gotten written approval, and that I handed the defense a gift.
The hearing is tomorrow at nine. My union rep pulled me aside this afternoon and said he’d gotten a call from someone inside the agency. He looked at me like he was about to deliver bad news, sat me down, and said, “I need to tell you something about Tricia’s complaint. There’s a part of it you haven’t seen yet, and when you read what she wrote about Dominic – “
What She Wrote
He didn’t finish the sentence right away. He just set a folder on the table and looked at his hands for a second.
My union rep’s name is Pete Donahue. He’s been doing this job for twenty-two years. He’s the kind of guy who eats a sandwich during a crisis. I have never seen him pause before finishing a sentence.
He slid the folder toward me.
Tricia’s complaint was eleven pages. I’d seen the first eight. Pages nine through eleven were an addendum she’d filed separately on Monday afternoon, after the initial submission. Pete had gotten a copy from his contact in HR about forty minutes before he found me.
I read it standing up because I forgot to sit back down.
The addendum wasn’t about my conduct. It was about Dominic’s. She’d written that the child’s “atypically composed demeanor” during testimony was “inconsistent with documented trauma presentation” and raised questions about whether his account had been “coached or reinforced through emotional staging.” She used the phrase “emotional staging” four times. She suggested the presence of the bikers had “potentially contaminated the child’s testimony” and recommended the agency conduct a secondary review of the case file, including my session notes with Dominic, going back to October.
She was trying to poke a hole in his testimony.
A seven-year-old boy who hadn’t slept in four days, who’d been hiding under a bed at six in the morning, who walked into a courtroom and told twelve adults exactly what had been done to him, and Tricia Holbrook wrote eleven pages suggesting he seemed too calm and that maybe something was off about his story.
Pete said, “I wanted you to know before tomorrow. So you’re not blindsided.”
I put the folder down. I walked to the window. Outside it was gray and cold, the kind of February afternoon that looks like it smells like wet concrete, and I stood there for probably a full minute not saying anything.
Nineteen Years
Here’s what you need to understand about how I got to that window.
I took this job in 2005. I was twenty-six. My supervisor at the time was a woman named Gloria Perkins, who’d been doing it since 1987, and she told me on my first day: “The system will try to make you love the process more than the kid. Don’t let it.”
I have spent nineteen years not letting it.
I’ve driven to hospitals at 2 AM. I’ve sat on kitchen floors with children who didn’t speak English and didn’t know my name and were shaking so hard their teeth clicked. I’ve testified in court, filled out ten thousand forms, argued with judges, argued with lawyers, argued with foster parents, argued with biological parents who were trying and failing and sometimes trying again. I’ve been cussed out by a nine-year-old and I’ve been hugged by a teenager I hadn’t seen in six years who told me I was the only person who’d showed up.
I’ve never done anything that felt reckless.
What I did for Dominic felt like the opposite of reckless. It felt like the most careful thing I’d done in months. I’d thought about it. I’d talked to his therapist, Dr. Sandra Yee, who’d said she thought it was worth trying. I’d called Doug Wozniak the night before and explained the situation. He’d asked me three questions about Dominic: How old, what happened, what does he need. I told him. Doug said, “We’ll be there.”
That’s it. That’s the whole authorization process I skipped. I didn’t fill out a form. I didn’t send an email to Tricia and wait forty-eight hours for a response that might have come back as a no, while Dominic spent another two days under that bed.
Maybe that was wrong. I’ve been turning it over in my head since Thursday. But I keep getting stuck on the same thing: the form would have protected me. Going through channels would have protected me. What I did protected Dominic.
Those are not always the same thing.
Doug Wozniak
I called Doug after I left Pete’s office.
He picked up on the second ring. I could hear wind in the background, or maybe a TV. I told him what was in the addendum. There was a pause.
“She’s saying his testimony was bad because he wasn’t falling apart,” Doug said.
“Essentially.”
Another pause. “That’s something.”
Doug is sixty-one. Retired from Cleveland Fire in 2019, twenty-eight years on the job. He started the Guardians on Chrome chapter here four years ago after he read about a program in Texas. He’s got a granddaughter. He mentioned her once, briefly, and then didn’t again.
He said, “What do you need from me?”
I said I didn’t know yet. Maybe a statement. Maybe nothing. The hearing was in the morning and I still wasn’t sure what shape it was going to take.
He said, “For what it’s worth. That kid. When we were walking up the steps.” He stopped. Started again. “He looked up at me right before we went through the doors and he said, ‘Are you gonna wait?’ Like he wanted to know if we’d still be there when he came out.”
I didn’t say anything.
“I told him we’d be on the steps. All six of us. And we were.” Doug paused. “He came out and he looked for us first thing. Before his foster mom, before anybody. He came right to us.”
I thanked him and got off the phone.
I sat in my car in the parking garage for a while. It was 5:40 PM. The hearing was fifteen hours away.
The Hearing
I got there at 8:30. Pete was already in the hallway with a cup of coffee and a look on his face that I’d learned to read as brace yourself but not too hard.
Tricia was there with two people from HR and the agency’s legal liaison, a guy named Farris who I’d met once at a training in 2021 and who had the energy of someone who’d rather be anywhere else.
We went into a conference room on the fourth floor. Gray carpet, long table, fluorescent lights doing their worst. There was a pitcher of water nobody touched.
I’d written out a statement. Four pages. I read most of it and summarized the rest. I talked about Dominic’s documented trauma response, his therapy records, my consultation with Dr. Yee, the Guardians on Chrome’s nonprofit status and their track record in eleven other counties across Ohio and Pennsylvania. I talked about the call from Barb at six in the morning. I talked about the bed.
Tricia sat across from me and did not look at me once during the four pages.
When I finished, Farris asked some questions. Standard stuff. Did I have documentation of the consultation with the therapist. Yes. Did I have any prior written communication with the Guardians on Chrome. No. Had I been given any explicit guidance, written or verbal, prohibiting the use of community volunteers in court escort situations. I said I hadn’t, and I watched Farris write something down.
Then Pete put a document on the table.
I hadn’t known he was going to do this. He’d gotten a statement from the prosecutor, a woman named Renata Okafor, who’d been in that courtroom. The statement was two paragraphs. It said that Dominic’s testimony had been clear, consistent, and given without any sign of coaching. It said the child’s composure was consistent with what she’d observed in other child witnesses who’d received adequate support and preparation. It said, specifically, that in her professional opinion the presence of the Guardians on Chrome had been a net positive for the proceedings.
Tricia asked to see the document. Pete slid it to her.
She read it. Put it down. Said nothing.
Farris called a recess at 10:20.
What Came Back
They came back at 11:05.
The thirty-day suspension was off the table. The supervised caseload review was reduced to a standard thirty-day check-in, which is something they do with any case that generates a formal complaint, regardless of outcome. Pete told me this was essentially nothing. A box they had to check.
I was issued a formal notice about the importance of prior authorization when introducing community volunteers into active cases. It’s in my file. It’ll stay there.
That’s it.
I walked out of that building at 11:30 in the morning and stood on the sidewalk and the cold hit me in the face and I thought about Dominic coming out of that courtroom and looking for the bikers first.
I don’t know what happens to him next. That’s the part of this job that doesn’t get easier, no matter how many years you do it. You’re in a kid’s life for a window. You try to make the window matter. Then the case moves, the placement changes, the years go by, and you hear things secondhand or not at all.
I know what happened in that courtroom. I know he got through it.
I know six guys in leather vests stood on the courthouse steps and waited for him to come back out.
Tricia sent me an email at 2 PM. It said she hoped we could move forward professionally. I read it once and closed my laptop.
Tomorrow I have three home visits and a placement review. The work doesn’t pause.
It never does.
—
If this one got to you, pass it along to someone who needs to read it.
If you enjoyed this story, you might also like to read about how I faced a review board after letting twelve bikers walk my foster kid into court, or the time thirty motorcycles turned onto the street while I was in the foster home driveway. You can also check out the time my seven-year-old client had to testify, and then I heard the rumbling.
